Good lecturer vs Useless lecturers

Good lecturer: Ian BEAMAN for Financial Modelling

Useless lecturers:
1)Andrzej CEGLOWSKI for Accounting Information System
2)Wen QU for first-half of Company Reporting
3)Jacqueline BIRT for second-half of Company Reporting
4)Berekat REDDA for Cost Information for Decision Making
5)Kathy AVRAM for Commercial Banking & Finance

My definition of useless is the inability to explain coherently regarding the presented slides/materials. Financial Modelling lecture is like the ultimate best lecturer relative to the others since he always summarises the materials in the most understandable context for students.

Kathy Avram only mumbles her own word.

Jacqueline Birt's accent irritates the hell out of me plus very long-winded until the presented material means nothing to me

Berekat Redda is no different compare to Yunus Ali back at Sunway Campus cause "English problem" as he can't conveys he's message in an understandable language though he really knows he's materials but it's the communication problem, moreover he's also very long-winded with he's lectures especially the all time famous "bla bla...therefore...bla bla...therefore..bla bla" which linked so much of info into a line, so how to digest all in one time?

Wen Qu demoralises me as well as the entire class with her first encounter with us by telling "some of you here might be taking this paper for the THIRD or FOURTH time already, hence proven it is a very hard paper..." and the final lecture with "Goodluck everyone, I HOPE I won't have to see you again next semester".

Andrzej Ceglowski's presentation of information is very unconventional because it is full of diagrams and minimal words. He's not that bad compare to the rest that falls under this category.

Exams are around the corner. My dates: 15(2.30pm), 17(2.30pm), 24(2.30pm) & 29(9.30am) June 2009. Semua 3(tiga) jam paper excluding 10 minutes reading time. Screewwweed!!! I'm in a shit hole now!